Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Accreditation: dispelling the myths.

Journal of Allied Health

|November 1, 1983

Summary

Accreditation in allied health education is vital. This article debunks common myths surrounding nongovernmental programmatic accreditation, clarifying its purpose and processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An evaluation of the self-study process.

The American journal of medical technology·1979

Same author

ALTERATION IN SERUM LIPIDS INDUCED BY METRECAL IN OBESE PATIENTS.

The American journal of the medical sciences·1964

Same author

Chlorothiazide effects on serum lipids in diabetic patients.

The American journal of the medical sciences·1962

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Allied Health Education
Programmatic Accreditation
Educational Policy

Background:

Accreditation is a critical component of allied health education, ensuring quality and standards.
Understanding the nuances of accreditation is essential for institutions and students.
Nongovernmental programmatic accreditation plays a significant role in shaping educational outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the fundamental purposes of accreditation in allied health education.
To identify and address eight prevalent myths surrounding nongovernmental programmatic accreditation.
To clarify the balance between professional society control and public/student accountability in accreditation.

Main Methods:

The study involves a comprehensive review of existing literature and accreditation standards.
Analysis of common misconceptions regarding national versus statewide accreditation methods.
Examination of the roles of volunteers and paid staff in the accreditation process.

Main Results:

Eight specific myths concerning accreditation processes were identified and analyzed.
Distinctions were made between professional society control and public/student accountability.
The study highlights the importance of US Department of Education criteria and Council on Postsecondary Accreditation provisions.

Conclusions:

Dispelling myths about accreditation is crucial for transparency and effectiveness in allied health education.
Accreditation processes must balance professional standards with consumer protection.
Adherence to established criteria ensures the credibility and integrity of allied health programs.

Related Experiment Videos