Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Accreditation: dispelling the myths.

C M Elkins

    Journal of Allied Health
    |November 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Accreditation in allied health education is vital. This article debunks common myths surrounding nongovernmental programmatic accreditation, clarifying its purpose and processes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An evaluation of the self-study process.

    The American journal of medical technology·1979
    Same author

    ALTERATION IN SERUM LIPIDS INDUCED BY METRECAL IN OBESE PATIENTS.

    The American journal of the medical sciences·1964
    Same author

    Chlorothiazide effects on serum lipids in diabetic patients.

    The American journal of the medical sciences·1962
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Allied Health Education
    • Programmatic Accreditation
    • Educational Policy

    Background:

    • Accreditation is a critical component of allied health education, ensuring quality and standards.
    • Understanding the nuances of accreditation is essential for institutions and students.
    • Nongovernmental programmatic accreditation plays a significant role in shaping educational outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the fundamental purposes of accreditation in allied health education.
    • To identify and address eight prevalent myths surrounding nongovernmental programmatic accreditation.
    • To clarify the balance between professional society control and public/student accountability in accreditation.

    Main Methods:

    • The study involves a comprehensive review of existing literature and accreditation standards.
    • Analysis of common misconceptions regarding national versus statewide accreditation methods.
    • Examination of the roles of volunteers and paid staff in the accreditation process.

    Main Results:

    • Eight specific myths concerning accreditation processes were identified and analyzed.
    • Distinctions were made between professional society control and public/student accountability.
    • The study highlights the importance of US Department of Education criteria and Council on Postsecondary Accreditation provisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Dispelling myths about accreditation is crucial for transparency and effectiveness in allied health education.
    • Accreditation processes must balance professional standards with consumer protection.
    • Adherence to established criteria ensures the credibility and integrity of allied health programs.

    Related Experiment Videos