Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction.

S Mateeff, A Gourevich

    Biological Cybernetics
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The time it takes to detect changes in speed and direction of visual motion.

    Vision research·2002
    Same author

    Speed decrements are seen better than increments through small apertures.

    Experimental brain research·2002
    Same author

    Mechanisms of simple and choice reaction to changes in direction of visual motion.

    Vision research·2000
    Same author

    The discrimination of abrupt changes in speed and direction of visual motion.

    Vision research·2000
    Same author

    The simple reaction time to changes in direction of visual motion.

    Experimental brain research·1999
    Same author

    What determines the detection of changes in motion velocity? A comment on Dzhafarov, Sekuler, and Allik (1993)

    Perception & psychophysics·1996
    Same journal

    Harmonic memory in phasor neural networks.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    Same journal

    Correction: Decreased spinal inhibition leads to undiversified locomotor patterns.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    Same journal

    Foundational issues of network models in biology.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamical mechanisms for coordinating long-term working memory based on the precision of spike-timing in cortical neurons.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    Same journal

    Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    Same journal

    Fluctuation-response relations for a two-stage population of spiking neurons stimulated by common noise.

    Biological cybernetics·2026
    See all related articles

    Subjects mislocated light stimuli towards the center of vision, even with a visible scale. This visual perception error, termed the "fixation error," increased with stimulus distance and is linked to egocentric direction preference.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Psychophysics
    • Retinal locus studies

    Background:

    • Understanding visual localization is crucial for cognitive science.
    • Previous studies have explored spatial perception but often lack detailed analysis of egocentric referencing.
    • The influence of visual frames of reference on stimulus localization requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate systematic errors in localizing brief light stimuli.
    • To determine the relationship between stimulus eccentricity and localization error.
    • To explore the role of egocentric direction versus external frames of reference in visual localization.

    Main Methods:

    • Subjects localized brief light stimuli presented at various eccentricities (up to 10 degrees) from the fixation center.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Localization was performed using a continuously illuminated scale with numbered or lettered divisions as a frame of reference.
  • Systematic errors in localization were quantified and analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Consistent systematic errors were observed, with stimuli being mislocalized nearer to the fixation point.
    • The magnitude of these angular errors increased with stimulus eccentricity.
    • The observed error was characteristic of the stimulated retinal locus and independent of viewing distance or scale elements.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite a visible frame of reference, subjects prioritize perceived egocentric direction over physical stimulus direction.
    • This egocentric bias in visual localization is a significant factor in spatial perception.
    • Findings suggest parallels with serial position effects in letter identification, indicating shared cognitive mechanisms.