Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interrupting visual feedback in writing.

G A Hull, W L Smith

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |December 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Preventing writers from re-reading hinders discourse production, impacting writing quality for both experienced and inexperienced individuals. However, different writing groups employed distinct linguistic strategies to cope with this visual feedback interruption.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Phylogenetics of Archerfishes (Toxotidae) and Evolution of the Toxotid Shooting Apparatus.

    Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2022
    Same author

    Splitting of the distal median nerve.

    Folia morphologica·2021
    Same author

    Poster - Thur Eve - 11: A realistic respiratory trace generator and its application to respiratory management techniques.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    Two waves of colonization straddling the K-Pg boundary formed the modern reef fish fauna.

    Proceedings. Biological sciences·2014
    Same author

    External respiratory motion analysis and statistics for patients and volunteers.

    Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2013
    Same author

    Clinical consequences of changing the sliding window IMRT dose rate.

    Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2012
    Same journal

    Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Linguistics
    • Writing Studies

    Background:

    • Visual feedback, specifically the ability to re-read, plays a crucial role in the writing process.
    • Understanding how interruptions to this feedback loop affect writers of varying expertise is essential for pedagogical and theoretical insights.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of restricted visual feedback on the written output of experienced and inexperienced writers.
    • To analyze the linguistic strategies employed by writers when re-reading is prevented.

    Main Methods:

    • Two groups of writers (9 experienced, 9 inexperienced) were tasked with producing written texts without the ability to re-read.
    • Written texts were systematically analyzed for errors, syntactic structures, overall quality, and sentence connectedness.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Both experienced and inexperienced writers could produce grammatically sound sentences despite the lack of re-reading.
    • Discourse-level production was significantly hindered for both groups.
    • Distinct linguistic strategies were observed in response to the imposed writing constraint.

    Conclusions:

    • Interrupting visual feedback significantly affects higher-level discourse production in writing.
    • Writers adapt to the absence of re-reading through group-specific linguistic strategies, highlighting cognitive differences in writing processes.