Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Must doctors save their patients?

J Harris

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |December 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Medication use in hospitalized nonagenarians.

    Internal medicine journal·2002
    Same author

    Ignorance, information and autonomy.

    Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2002
    Same author

    Crete: does farming explain urban and rural differences in atopy?

    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2001
    Same author

    One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.

    Journal of medical ethics·2001
    Same author

    RTOG 96-10: reirradiation with concurrent hydroxyurea and 5-fluorouracil in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2001
    Same author

    Electrogastrographic norms in children: toward the development of standard methods, reproducible results, and reliable normative data.

    Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition·2001
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Not all personal utilities are equal: a two-tier normative framework for genomic health technology assessment.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Correction: Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Emergent ethics of xenotransplantation: findings from a survey on public attitudes toward animal to human organ transplantation in the UK.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Is sport in the 'public interest'? Towards a legal and ethical framework for justifying sport-related harm.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    This study explores the moral obligation of healthcare professionals to treat patients, independent of legal duties. It examines if this obligation differs from the general public

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Bioethics
    • Professional Responsibility

    Background:

    • The ethical landscape of medical practice often assumes a duty to treat.
    • Legal and contractual obligations are distinct from inherent moral imperatives.
    • Societal expectations place a unique moral burden on healthcare providers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine if a general moral obligation exists for medical staff to treat those in need, irrespective of legal or contractual ties.
    • To analyze whether this moral obligation is unique to medical professionals compared to the general populace.
    • To assess the degree of culpability for medical professionals who fail to treat patients and explore societal support mechanisms.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical inquiry and ethical analysis.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of moral philosophy principles applied to medical contexts.
  • Comparative analysis of professional versus general moral duties.

    • Main Results:

    • A moral obligation to treat the needy exists for medical professionals, distinct from legal duties.
    • The failure to treat is considered more blameworthy for doctors due to their specialized role and societal trust.
    • Societal support is crucial to mitigate the hardships associated with this moral obligation.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare professionals possess a significant moral obligation to treat patients, grounded in ethical principles rather than solely legal requirements.
    • Societal structures must acknowledge and support this moral imperative to ensure its sustainable practice.
    • Ethical frameworks should guide medical professionals in navigating the complexities of their duty to care.