Related Experiment Videos
Behavior and performance of pigs grouped by three different methods at weaning
Journal of Animal Science
|December 1, 1983
Summary
Mixing unfamiliar pigs increases fighting but does not impact long-term growth. An odor masking agent (OMA) showed no significant effect on pig behavior or performance in nursery pens.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Animal Behavior
- Swine Production
Background:
- Postweaning piglet regrouping can induce stress and aggression.
- Tail biting and fighting are common issues in group-housed pigs.
- Odor masking agents (OMA) are sometimes used to mitigate aggression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of different pig grouping strategies on agonistic behavior.
- To assess the efficacy of an odor masking agent (OMA) in reducing aggression during piglet regrouping.
- To determine the impact of grouping and OMA on pig performance.
Main Methods:
- 384 crossbred pigs were housed in nursery pens under three grouping treatments (8-1, 4-2, 1-8).
- An odor masking agent (OMA) was applied either before or after mixing.
- Agonistic behavior was observed, and average daily gain and feed intake were measured.
Main Results:
- Combining pigs from different litters significantly increased fighting.
- OMA application had minimal and temporary effects on fighting, with a slight increase when applied before mixing.
- Neither OMA nor grouping strategy affected average daily gain or feed intake.
Conclusions:
- Social mixing of unfamiliar pigs increases aggression but does not compromise growth performance.
- The tested odor masking agent is ineffective in reducing pig fighting or improving performance.
- Management strategies should focus on minimizing social stress during regrouping.