Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Load optimization for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.

R Dotan, O Bar-Or

European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology

|January 1, 1983

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Physiological and cognitive responses to cold exposure in 11-12-year-old boys.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017

Same author

Longitudinal analysis of the sweating response of pre-, mid-, and late-pubertal boys during exercise in the heat.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017

Same author

Trainability of the Prepubescent Child.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016

Same author

Asthma, exercise-induced asthma, and aquatic physical activities.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014

Same author

Reliability and validity of the lactate-minimum test. A revisit.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2011

Same author

Cocontraction in three age groups of children during treadmill locomotion.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2010

Same journal

Reply to the letter by morton

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

Same journal

Effects of caffeine, ephedrine and their combination on time to exhaustion during high-intensity exercise.

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

Same journal

The effect of strength training on estimates of mitochondrial density and distribution throughout muscle fibres.

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

Same journal

Latency to CNS oxygen toxicity in rats as a function of PCO(2) and PO(2).

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

Same journal

Diurnal variations in ventilatory and cardiorespiratory responses to submaximal treadmill exercise in females.

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

Same journal

Comparison of cardiopulmonary responses to two types of dry-land upper-body exercise testing modes in competitive swimmers.

European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology·1999

See all related articles

This study identified optimal resistance loads for the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) to maximize power output in leg and arm tests. These findings provide guidelines for accurate anaerobic capacity assessment.

Area of Science:

Sports Science
Exercise Physiology
Biomechanics

Background:

The Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a common tool for assessing anaerobic capacity.
Determining optimal resistance loads is crucial for accurate power output measurements in the WAnT.
Previous research has not definitively established optimal loads for both leg and arm WAnT modes.

Purpose of the Study:

To define the optimal resistance loads (OL) for eliciting maximal power output (PO) in the leg and arm modes of the 30-second Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT).

Main Methods:

Eighteen female and seventeen male students performed the WAnT on a cycle ergometer across five randomized resistance loads.
The test was administered for both leg and arm modes.
A parabola-fitting technique was used to determine optimal loads from mean power output data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Optimal loads (OL) were determined to be 5.04 J·rev⁻¹·kg⁻¹ (leg, women), 5.13 J·rev⁻¹·kg⁻¹ (leg, men), 2.82 J·rev⁻¹·kg⁻¹ (arm, women), and 3.52 J·rev⁻¹·kg⁻¹ (arm, men).
Optimal loads were found to be dependent on power output magnitude.
Mean power output showed minimal variation (≤2.2%) within a specific load range around the OL.

Conclusions:

The WAnT demonstrates relative insensitivity to moderate variations in resistance load.
Recommended optimal loads can serve as guidelines for improved anaerobic capacity assessment.
Individual modifications to these loads based on body composition and fitness level are suggested.