Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures.

L Jerlvall, H Dryselius, S Arlinger

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Computer-controlled audiometry offers reliable hearing threshold determination, showing good correlation with manual methods. This automated approach provides more consistent test-retest results for clinical applications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On light-induced sneezing.

    Eye (London, England)·2009
    Same author

    Reference data for evaluation of occupationally noise-induced hearing loss.

    Noise & health·2005
    Same author

    Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people.

    International journal of audiology·2003
    Same author

    Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.

    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
    Same author

    Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
    Same author

    Cognitive effects in dichotic speech testing in elderly persons.

    Ear and hearing·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Hearing Science
    • Medical Technology

    Background:

    • Accurate hearing threshold determination is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
    • Traditional manual audiometry can be time-consuming and prone to variability.
    • Advancements in technology offer potential improvements in audiological testing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the accuracy and reliability of manual versus computer-controlled audiometry.
    • To evaluate the test-retest reliability of automated audiometric threshold determination.
    • To assess the clinical applicability of computer-controlled audiometry.

    Main Methods:

    • Ten normal-hearing subjects participated in the study.
    • Audiometric thresholds were measured using both manual and computer-controlled methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The ascending threshold determination method, as per ISO standards, was employed.

    • Main Results:

    • Thresholds obtained via manual and computer-controlled audiometry demonstrated strong correlation.
    • Computer-controlled audiometry yielded significantly lower standard deviations in test-retest differences.
    • Automated testing proved to be rapid and reliable.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-controlled audiometry provides accurate and reliable hearing threshold measurements.
    • The reduced variability in computer-controlled testing enhances its clinical utility.
    • Automated audiometry presents a valuable tool for efficient and dependable audiological assessments.