Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Magnetic resonance without nuclear.

T F Meaney

    Radiology
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The American College of Radiology recommends using "Magnetic Resonance" instead of "Nuclear Magnetic Resonance." This change aims to improve clarity and accuracy in medical imaging terminology.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Monitoring therapeutic response of human superficial tumors using phase-encoded spectroscopy.

    Magnetic resonance in medicine·1989
    Same author

    Invasive radiology.

    Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·1989
    Same author

    Radiologic methods of bile duct stone extraction.

    American journal of surgery·1989
    Same author

    The decline of diagnostic radiology: call to action. 1989 Dotter lecture.

    Radiology·1989
    Same author

    Therapeutic response of breast carcinoma monitored by 31P MRS in situ.

    Magnetic resonance in medicine·1989
    Same author

    Human neoplasm pH and response to radiation therapy: P-31 MR spectroscopy studies in situ.

    Radiology·1989
    Same journal

    Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Physics

    Background:

    • The term "Nuclear Magnetic Resonance" has historically been used to describe the imaging modality.
    • Concerns exist regarding the accuracy and public perception of the term "nuclear."

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide the rationale behind the recommendation to change terminology.
    • To advocate for the adoption of "Magnetic Resonance" in scientific and clinical contexts.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of historical terminology in radiology.
    • Analysis of the physical principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

    Main Results:

    • The term "Nuclear Magnetic Resonance" is a misnomer as the phenomenon does not rely on nuclear properties.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • "Magnetic Resonance" more accurately reflects the underlying physics and avoids potential public apprehension associated with the word "nuclear."

    • Conclusions:

    • The shift to "Magnetic Resonance" is scientifically justified and will enhance clarity.
    • Adoption of the new terminology is recommended for consistent and accurate communication in the field of medical imaging.