Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The appendix stump: should it be invaginated?

D A Watters, M A Walker, B C Abernethy

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
    |March 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa for reconstruction of a soft palate defect following marginal resection of a melanoma in a dog.

    The Journal of small animal practice·2025
    Same author

    Root pressure-volume curve traits capture rootstock drought tolerance.

    Annals of botany·2021
    Same author

    The Value of Reporting Perioperative Mortality Rates (POMR).

    World journal of surgery·2020
    Same author

    A Technique for Screening Grape Germplasm for Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Surgical training programmes in the South Pacific, Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste.

    The British journal of surgery·2019
    Same author

    Genetic characterization of Vitis germplasm collected from the southwestern US and Mexico to expedite Pierce's disease-resistance breeding.

    TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2018
    Same journal

    A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a low-middle-income country setting.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Designing sustainable robotic surgery for NHS scale-up: direct electricity measurement and an implementation-ready energy mitigation bundle in colorectal cancer resections.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Trends and causes of litigation in paediatric surgery within the National Health Service (NHS) England: a 19-year analysis.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP is a safe procedure with good outcomes: experience from a single high-volume upper GI unit.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre observational study of 1,026 patients with no cases identified according to the Budapest criteria.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    Same journal

    Can a generic fracture fixation assessment tool be used to assess quality of distal radius fracture fixation, and predict fixation failure?

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2026
    See all related articles

    Comparing appendix stump treatments in appendicectomy, this study found no significant difference in wound infection or hospital stay between ligation alone and ligation with invagination for surgical patients.

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Innovation
    • Clinical Trials
    • Gastrointestinal Surgery

    Background:

    • Appendicectomy is a common surgical procedure.
    • Effective management of the appendix stump is crucial for preventing complications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of two methods for treating the appendix stump after appendicectomy: ligation alone versus ligation and invagination.
    • To assess the impact of these techniques on postoperative outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • A prospective trial involving 103 patients undergoing appendicectomy.
    • Patients were randomized into two groups: one with appendix stump treated by ligation alone, the other by ligation and invagination.
    • Exclusion criteria included perforated appendices; no drains or antibiotics were used.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • No statistically significant difference was observed between the ligation alone and ligation with invagination groups.
    • Outcomes assessed included rates of wound infection and duration of postoperative hospital stay.
    • Patient demographics and appendiceal inflammation severity were comparable between groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Both ligation alone and ligation with invagination are equally effective in managing the appendix stump during appendicectomy.
    • Neither method demonstrated superiority in reducing wound infections or hospital stay in this patient cohort.