Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When consent is unbearable--a case report.

M H Kottow

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |June 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Informed consent is a cornerstone of medical ethics, but not always applicable. This report examines a case where informed consent was intentionally omitted, exploring the complex ethical considerations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Should medical ethics justify violence?

    Journal of medical ethics·2006
    Same author

    Who is my brother's keeper?

    Journal of medical ethics·2002
    Same author

    Theoretical aids in teaching medical ethics.

    Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2000
    Same author

    Patenting medical procedures.

    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2000
    Same author

    AZT in Africa.

    The Journal of clinical ethics·2000
    Same author

    In defence of medical ethics.

    Journal of medical ethics·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Patient Rights
    • Clinical Decision-Making

    Background:

    • Informed consent is a fundamental ethical principle in healthcare.
    • Patients generally have the right to be fully informed about their medical condition and treatment options.
    • Patient autonomy includes the right to participate in or solely decide on medical interventions.

    Observation:

    • The report details a specific clinical case.
    • In this case, informed consent was deliberately not obtained from the patient.
    • This situation presents a deviation from standard ethical protocols.

    Findings:

    • The case highlights circumstances where the standard application of informed consent may be challenged.
    • Ethical dilemmas arise when patient rights appear to conflict with other considerations.
    • The deliberate omission of informed consent necessitates a thorough ethical review.

    Implications:

    • This case study prompts a deeper discussion on the boundaries and exceptions to informed consent.
    • It underscores the need for careful ethical deliberation in complex medical scenarios.
    • Understanding these exceptions is crucial for navigating challenging medical ethics cases.

    Related Experiment Videos