Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experience with inflatable penile prosthesis.

I J Fishman, F B Scott, J K Light

    Urology
    |May 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Penile prosthesis surgery, specifically the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), offers a functional solution for erectile dysfunction. This review covers IPP histology and a decade of surgical experience.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effects of disinfectants on Toxocara canis embryogenesis and larval establishment in mice tissues.

    Zoonoses and public health·2010
    Same author

    Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.

    The Journal of urology·2001
    Same author

    Scanning electron microscope observations on third-instar Gasterophilus nasalis (Diptera: Oestridae).

    Journal of medical entomology·1999
    Same author

    Scanning electron microscopy of the second-instar larva of Gasterophilus nasalis.

    Medical and veterinary entomology·1999
    Same author

    Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

    The Journal of urology·1998
    Same author

    Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of rhabdosphincter component of the prostatic capsule.

    The Journal of urology·1997
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Extended versus Standard Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Intractable Epistaxis and Severe Hypertension in a Young Woman.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    A 53-Year-Old Man with Elevated PSA and a Cystic Pelvic Lesion.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Low-Grade, Papillary Bladder Tumors A plea for in-office fulguration.

    Urology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Medical Device Technology
    • Surgical Innovation

    Background:

    • Erectile impotence management is a key urological concern.
    • The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) aims to restore penile function.
    • Significant advancements have improved IPP design and implantation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a histologic review of the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).
    • To present a ten-year clinical experience with IPP surgery.
    • To evaluate the long-term performance and histological characteristics of IPPs.

    Main Methods:

    • Histologic examination of explanted or retrieved IPPs.
    • Review of surgical implantation techniques over ten years.
    • Analysis of patient outcomes and device integrity.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Detailed histologic findings of the IPP material and tissue interactions.
    • Ten-year data on surgical success rates and complication profiles.
    • Evidence of device durability and biocompatibility over time.

    Conclusions:

    • The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a reliable option for erectile impotence.
    • Surgical technique modifications have enhanced IPP outcomes.
    • Histologic review supports the long-term safety and efficacy of IPPs.