Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

'Baby Doe' rules. There are alternatives.

D E Johnson, T R Thompson, M Aroskar

    American Journal of Diseases of Children (1960)
    |June 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Healthcare providers can develop an infant advocacy process as an alternative to government regulations. This process optimizes infant care and public accountability through ethical propositions, decision-making principles, and committee review guidelines.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The health of children adopted from Romania.

    JAMA·1992
    Same author

    Workers' comp: more confusion over dispute resolution.

    Texas medicine·1992
    Same author

    Epididymo-orchitis developing as a late manifestation of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy and masquerading as a primary testicular malignancy: a report of 2 cases.

    The Journal of urology·1992
    Same author

    Maintenance energy requirement of llamas.

    American journal of veterinary research·1992
    Same author

    Histopathologic and angiographic analysis of coronary artery morphology six months after triple artery angioplasty.

    The American journal of cardiology·1992
    Same author

    Iron deficiency of liver, heart, and brain in newborn infants of diabetic mothers.

    The Journal of pediatrics·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Pediatric Healthcare Policy
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • The federal "Baby Doe" rule has faced significant opposition from healthcare providers.
    • There is a need for constructive alternatives to government mandates in infant care decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present an alternative infant advocacy process developed within a community.
    • To optimize individual patient care and ensure public accountability in infant medical decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a multistep infant advocacy process.
    • Establishment of six ethical propositions for infant best interests.
    • Definition of five decision-making principles for physician and parent obligations.
    • Creation of guidelines for committee review respecting all stakeholders.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed process integrates ethical considerations, clear decision-making principles, and structured committee reviews.
    • It aims to balance the rights of the child and parents with societal interests in life-and-death decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • An alternative infant advocacy process offers a constructive approach for healthcare providers.
    • This model promotes ethical decision-making and accountability in pediatric care, respecting all parties involved.

    Related Experiment Videos