Related Experiment Videos
A pseudo-outbreak of influenza A associated with use of laboratory stock strain
Abstract:
In November 1982, when influenza type A(H3N2) viruses were spreading in the United States, influenza A(H1N1) viruses were reportedly isolated from 10 hospitalized patients in New Mexico, only two of whom had influenza-like illnesses. Reference stock influenza A/Fort Monmouth (FM)/1/47(H1N1) virus had been used to prepare fluorescent antibody test slides in the laboratory reporting the isolates. After investigation, it was concluded that the isolates from the patients' cultures were a result of laboratory contamination. When an unexpected cluster of unusual virus isolates is reported, the possibility of laboratory contamination should be considered.
Insights
Laboratory contamination caused unexpected influenza A(H1N1) virus isolates in New Mexico. This highlights the importance of considering lab contamination when unusual virus findings occur, especially during influenza A(H3N2) outbreaks.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Infectious Diseases
- Laboratory Diagnostics
Background:
- Influenza A(H1N1) viruses were reportedly isolated from hospitalized patients in New Mexico in November 1982.
- These isolates occurred during a period when influenza A(H3N2) viruses were prevalent in the United States.
- Only two of the ten patients exhibited influenza-like illnesses, suggesting atypical presentation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the source of unexpected influenza A(H1N1) virus isolates.
- To determine if the reported isolates represented a true clinical outbreak or an alternative explanation.
- To emphasize the need for vigilance regarding laboratory procedures in virological diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of reported influenza A(H1N1) isolates.
- Investigation into the laboratory's diagnostic procedures and reagents.
- Examination of the reference stock influenza A/Fort Monmouth (FM)/1/47(H1N1) virus used for fluorescent antibody test slides.
Main Results:
- The influenza A(H1N1) isolates from patients were determined to be a result of laboratory contamination.
- The reference stock virus, influenza A/Fort Monmouth (FM)/1/47(H1N1), was implicated in the contamination.
- The findings underscore a potential for misidentification of viral agents due to laboratory error.
Conclusions:
- Laboratory contamination can lead to spurious identification of viral agents.
- When encountering unexpected clusters of unusual virus isolates, laboratory contamination must be considered as a potential cause.
- Rigorous quality control in diagnostic laboratories is crucial for accurate influenza surveillance.