Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
The effects of visual and spatial interference on spatial working memory
Abstract:
Baddeley and Lieberman (1980) have shown that processing within spatial working memory is disrupted by a spatial secondary task, but not significantly by a visual processing secondary task. In the present study their experiment was replicated under broadly similar circumstances. The spatial and verbal primary tasks involved remembering descriptions of spatially arranged or nonsense sequences of digits, respectively. The secondary visual and spatial tasks involved either judging the level of brightness or pressing an unseen matrix of buttons in a predetermined sequence. In contrast to the finding of Baddeley and Lieberman, both the visual and spatial secondary tasks significantly impaired spatial working memory. Neither of these secondary tasks significantly interfered with concurrent verbal processing. The present findings suggest that spatial working memory draws from resources from both visual and spatial quarters.
More Related Videos
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
14:24An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Working Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...