Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Linear and nonlinear components of human electroretinogram.

C L Baker, R F Hess

    Journal of Neurophysiology
    |May 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Interocular interaction of contrast and luminance signals in human primary visual cortex.

    NeuroImage·2017
    Same author

    Pattern-motion selective responses in MT, MST and the pulvinar of humans.

    The European journal of neuroscience·2012
    Same author

    Abnormal cortical processing of pattern motion in amblyopia: evidence from fMRI.

    NeuroImage·2012
    Same author

    Restoration of binocular vision in amblyopia.

    Strabismus·2011
    Same author

    A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development.

    Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
    Same author

    Observation of copulation in Amphiuma tridactylum.

    Journal. Tennessee Academy of Science·2010

    Electroretinography (ERG) reveals distinct linear and nonlinear components in visual responses. Understanding these components, rather than just stimulus type, better explains pattern versus uniform-field ERG differences.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Physiology

    Background:

    • The electroretinogram (ERG) is a key diagnostic tool for retinal function.
    • Distinctions between uniform-field and pattern ERGs are traditionally based on stimulus type.
    • The underlying physiological basis for these distinctions requires further clarification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare electroretinographic (ERG) responses to uniform-field and pattern stimuli.
    • To elucidate the relationship between transient and steady-state ERG responses.
    • To differentiate the linear and nonlinear components contributing to ERG.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized both transient and steady-state electroretinography (ERG).
    • Employed uniform-field and various pattern stimuli, including contrast-modulated gratings.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed responses across different temporal and spatial frequencies.

    • Main Results:

    • High temporal frequencies in steady-state ERG correspond to the fast wave of transient ERG.
    • Low temporal frequencies in steady-state ERG correspond to the slow wave of step response.
    • The fast ERG response comprises linear (odd-symmetric) and nonlinear (even-symmetric) components, with the latter showing spatial frequency dependence.

    Conclusions:

    • The distinction between uniform-field and pattern ERGs arises from the dominance of linear versus nonlinear components, respectively.
    • Uniform-field ERGs are primarily driven by the linear component, while pattern ERGs isolate the nonlinear component.
    • A uniform field can also elicit nonlinear responses, suggesting a more nuanced understanding based on response components rather than stimulus type alone.