Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical trials designed to evaluate therapeutic preferences.

J C Baskerville, J H Toogood, J Mazza

    Statistics in Medicine
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a novel experimental design to evaluate patient therapeutic preferences in clinical practice. It simulates real-world decision-making, offering an ethical alternative to traditional randomized controlled trials for treatment comparisons.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Impacts of a Clinical Quality Registry on Lung Cancer Quality Measures: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2025
    Same author

    Racial differences in intracerebral haemorrhage outcomes in patients with obesity.

    Obesity science & practice·2018
    Same author

    Review of the effects of inhaled steroid therapy on bone.

    The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
    Same author

    Chronic urticaria and angioedema.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2010
    Same author

    Tetanus Immunization.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Gamma Globulin and Asthma.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trials Methodology
    • Health Services Research
    • Pharmacoeconomics

    Background:

    • Evaluating patient preferences for similar therapies is crucial for optimizing treatment adherence and outcomes.
    • Traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) present ethical challenges regarding treatment allocation and may not fully reflect real-world clinical practice.
    • Existing methods for assessing therapeutic preferences often lack robust experimental designs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a novel experimental design for evaluating therapeutic preferences among established, similar therapies.
    • To simulate clinical decision-making processes in ordinary practice while maintaining scientific rigor.
    • To explore an ethical alternative to fixed-length randomized treatment allocation in conventional trials.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The proposed design measures therapeutic preference through clinical decisions to continue or discontinue treatments at patient visits.
    • It incorporates principles of experimental design to ensure scientific validity.
    • Analysis methods are discussed and illustrated with a case study comparing chronic asthma drug treatments.

    Main Results:

    • The experimental design effectively simulates patient and clinician decision-making in a real-world setting.
    • It provides a mechanism to assess the concordance between predicted treatment efficacy from RCTs and actual clinical performance.
    • Therapeutic preferences were successfully captured as a measure of treatment performance in ordinary clinical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • This novel trial design offers a practical and ethical approach to evaluating therapeutic preferences.
    • It bridges the gap between controlled trial efficacy and real-world clinical utility.
    • The method allows for a more nuanced understanding of treatment selection based on patient and clinician preferences.