Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structured interviews and borderline personality disorder.

A W Loranger, J M Oldham, L M Russakoff

    Archives of General Psychiatry
    |June 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The gut microbiota is associated with psychiatric symptom severity and treatment outcome among individuals with serious mental illness.

    Journal of affective disorders·2020
    Same author

    Undernutrition regulates the expression of a novel splice variant of myostatin and insulin-like growth factor 1 in ovine skeletal muscle.

    Domestic animal endocrinology·2015
    Same author

    Comorbid personality disorder and treatment use in a community sample of youths: a 20-year follow-up.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2007
    Same author

    Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.

    Journal of health care law & policy·2004
    Same author

    Personality disorders in adolescence and risk of major mental disorders and suicidality during adulthood.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2003
    Same author

    Prolonged underfeeding of sheep increases myostatin and myogenic regulatory factor Myf-5 in skeletal muscle while IGF-I and myogenin are repressed.

    The Journal of endocrinology·2003
    Same journal

    Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 2011.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2017
    Same journal

    Conflicts of interest-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    Epidemiologic evidence concerning the bereavement exclusion in major depression-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    About this journal.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    See all related articles

    The Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) and Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) show substantial agreement in diagnosing borderline personality disorder. However, differences in diagnostic criteria limit generalizing findings between the two systems.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology

    Background:

    • Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis relies on specific criteria.
    • The Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) and Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) are diagnostic tools.
    • Assessing concordance between diagnostic instruments is crucial for research reliability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate if the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) could be scored from the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS).
    • To determine if DIB scores predict the DSM-III diagnosis of borderline personality disorder.
    • To assess the concordance and potential discrepancies between the DIB and DSM-III criteria.

    Main Methods:

    • Clinicians conducted separate interviews using the DIB and a modified SADS on the same patient cohort.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients were diagnosed based on Gunderson and Singer's criteria for borderline personality disorder.
  • Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

    • Main Results:

    • Both interviews identified similar patient groups as borderline.
    • DIB scores demonstrated 70% sensitivity and 90% specificity in predicting DSM-III borderline personality disorder.
    • An intraclass correlation coefficient of .75 indicated substantial agreement between the measures.

    Conclusions:

    • There is significant concordance between the DIB and SADS in diagnosing borderline personality disorder.
    • Disparities between DSM-III and DIB diagnostic systems may hinder the generalization of research findings.
    • Researchers should be mindful of the specific diagnostic criteria used in studies involving borderline personality disorder.