Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Associations between size and development at four years among children who were small-for-dates and large-for-dates
Insights
Child development at 4 years is linked to birth size. Head circumference at birth was a significant predictor of overall development scores, especially in children with smaller heads.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Development
- Child Health
- Growth Monitoring
Background:
- Birth size, categorized as small-for-dates (SFD), average-for-dates (AFD), and large-for-dates (LFD), can influence long-term child development.
- Understanding the relationship between early somatic measures and later developmental status is crucial for identifying potential developmental risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate associations between various somatic measures and developmental status at four years of age.
- To examine these associations across different birthweight groups (SFD, AFD, LFD).
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study tracking children from birth to four years.
- Somatic measures (e.g., head circumference, weight-for-height) and developmental status were assessed.
- Statistical analyses, including correlation and subgroup analysis, were performed, adjusting for sex, social class, and series.
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation was found between head circumference and total developmental scores when all birthweight groups were combined.
- No significant correlations were observed between somatic measures and development in the SFD and AFD groups.
- A negative correlation between weight-for-height and total developmental scores was noted in the LFD group.
- Children with smaller head circumferences, irrespective of birthweight group, exhibited lower developmental scores.
Conclusions:
- Head circumference is a significant predictor of developmental status at four years.
- Early identification of smaller head circumference may indicate a need for closer developmental monitoring.
- The relationship between somatic measures and development varies depending on birthweight status.
Abstract:
Associations were sought between somatic measures and developmental status at 4 years among groups of children who had been small-for-dates (SFD), average-for-dates (AFD) and large-for-dates (LFD) at birth. When the three groups were combined, and adjustment made for sex, social class and series, a significant correlation was found between head circumference and total scores. Within the SFD and AFD groups no correlations were found between any somatic measures and aspects of development; and the only significant finding in the LFD group was a negative correlation between weight-for-height and total developmental scores. The somatic measures were then divided into three subgroups comprising children who had small, average, and large values for that measure, and developmental scores for each subgroup were computed. Within all three birthweight groups significant differences were found for head circumference: those with relatively small heads having lower scores than the rest.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Sources of Self-Esteem I: Family Experience

