Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pitfalls in evaluating the surgical student.

R M Stillman

    Surgery
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Chief residents

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A technique for feeding jejunostomy.

    Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics·1989
    Same author

    Effect of prior clinical experience on students' knowledge and performance in surgery.

    Surgery·1986
    Same author

    Repair of growing vessels. Continuous absorbable or interrupted nonabsorbable suture?

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same author

    Skin staples in potentially contaminated wounds.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1984
    Same author

    Validity of multiple-choice examinations in surgery.

    Surgery·1984
    Same author

    Determining the content of a surgical curriculum.

    Surgery·1983
    Same journal

    One-year health care expenditures and patient out-of-pocket spending after open versus minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

    Surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Shock index, hypotension, and blood product transfusion as predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder in firearm-related trauma.

    Surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarian patients.

    Surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistulas: Should we be concerned about incontinence?

    Surgery·2026
    Same journal

    No need for mesh in the repair of hiatal hernias: Autologous tissue hiatoplasty techniques for the repair of the complex diaphragmatic defect.

    Surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Incretin-based therapies and altered myocardial metabolism in a swine model of ischemic heart disease in the setting of metabolic syndrome.

    Surgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Surgical Training
    • Assessment Methods

    Background:

    • Evaluating surgical clerkship students is crucial for professional development.
    • Current assessment methods may vary in validity and focus.
    • Standardizing evaluation criteria is essential for accurate student assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the validity of different assessment methods for surgical clerkship students.
    • To analyze the content of evaluations provided by faculty and chief residents.
    • To identify factors influencing the focus of student evaluations in surgical education.

    Main Methods:

    • 105 surgical clerkship students were evaluated by faculty, chief residents, and written/oral exams.
    • Evaluations included written explanations and scores (1-honors to 5-failing).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the validity of assessment components.
  • Main Results:

    • Chief resident evaluations showed significantly lower validity compared to faculty evaluations (P < 0.01).
    • Residents focused more on technical skills (P < 0.001) and less on clinical reasoning (P < 0.001).
    • Faculty evaluations emphasized thought processes over technical factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Chief resident evaluations in surgical clerkships need refinement for improved validity.
    • Surgical education should emphasize clear evaluation criteria for house staff.
    • Shifting focus from technical details to logical diagnosis and treatment is recommended.