Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Profiling of Estrogen-regulated MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells
Published on: February 21, 2014
Isolation and characterization of an estrogen-inhibited variant derived from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line
Abstract:
The mechanism by which pharmacological concentrations of estrogen can paradoxically inhibit the growth of human breast cancer is unknown. We have selected for a variant line of MCF-7 which may help to understand this process. The variant was selected by exposing MCF-7 cells to high-specific-activity 16 alpha-[125I]iodoestradiol. These cells were viably frozen for two isotopic half-lives, defrosted once, then reexposed to 16 alpha-[125I]iodoestradiol to allow maximal radiation damage mediated by isotope associated with binding sites. This cell line (113) is one of 55 lines cloned from MCF-7 cells that survived this treatment. The growth response to estradiol of the 113 breast cancer cells grown in monolayer is normal for 4 to 6 days, and then the cell number plateaus as the cells appear to round up and detach. Concomitantly, a decrease in [3H]thymidine incorporation occurs. The cells cannot be rescued by removing estradiol from the medium. The inhibition is dose dependent and can be seen in concentrations of estradiol as low as 10(-10) M. The 113 cells are also inhibited by antiestrogens. They have normal levels of estrogen receptors which bind to DNA cellulose with activation. Progesterone receptors are estrogen inducible, although the levels are one-third that of wild-type MCF-7 cells. The morphological changes determined by electron microscopy of estrogen-treated cells are typical of degenerative cells. To investigate the possibility that inhibitory factors are secreted into the medium by 113 cells, conditioned medium from estrogen-exposed 113 cells is added to normal MCF-7 and 113 cells. No decrease in [3H]thymidine incorporation compared to controls is observed. When the secreted proteins are labeled with [35S]methionine and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-acrylamide gels, no major differences are apparent in the 113 and MCF-7 cells. Thus, the source of the defect is still unknown. It remains to be seen if the growth-inhibitory effects of 17 beta-estradiol on this cell line are receptor mediated or related to specific gene products which can be identified.
Insights
We developed a new breast cancer cell line (113) that shows paradoxical growth inhibition by estrogen. This estrogen-induced growth arrest in breast cancer cells may reveal new therapeutic targets.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- The paradoxical inhibition of human breast cancer growth by pharmacological estrogen concentrations remains poorly understood.
- Estrogen plays a complex role in breast cancer, with high doses sometimes exhibiting anti-proliferative effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanism behind estrogen's paradoxical growth inhibition in breast cancer.
- To characterize a novel MCF-7 breast cancer cell variant (113) selected for its response to high-dose estrogen.
Main Methods:
- Selected a variant MCF-7 cell line (113) using high-specific-activity 16 alpha-[125I]iodoestradiol and radiation damage.
- Assessed cell growth, [3H]thymidine incorporation, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels, and morphological changes.
- Investigated secreted factors by analyzing conditioned medium and radiolabeled proteins from estrogen-treated cells.
Main Results:
- The 113 cell line exhibited a 4-6 day normal growth response to estradiol, followed by plateauing, cell rounding, detachment, and decreased [3H]thymidine incorporation.
- Inhibition was dose-dependent, observed at estradiol concentrations as low as 10(-10) M, and also induced by antiestrogens.
- Cells possessed normal ERs with DNA binding but had reduced (one-third) estrogen-inducible PR levels; no inhibitory secreted factors were identified.
Conclusions:
- The 113 cell line demonstrates a unique estrogen-induced growth inhibition and degenerative morphology, suggesting a potential mechanism for paradoxical estrogen effects.
- The defect causing this growth inhibition is not due to secreted factors and the precise role of receptor-mediated pathways or specific gene products remains to be elucidated.

