Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Enteral feedings.

R Chernoff

    American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Enteral nutrition is often preferred over parenteral nutrition due to its effectiveness, lower cost, and fewer complications. Careful patient monitoring and formula selection are crucial for successful enteral feeding.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Nutrition and health promotion in older adults.

    The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2001
    Same author

    Maternal outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based support program for families of children with chronic illnesses.

    Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·2001
    Same author

    Food and nutrition services for the elderly.

    Health care food & nutrition focus·1998
    Same author

    Credentials available in human clinical nutrition: a report of the Intersociety Committee on Nutrition Certification.

    The American journal of clinical nutrition·1997
    Same author

    Credentials available in human clinical nutrition: a report of the Intersociety Committee on Nutrition Certification.

    Journal of the American College of Nutrition·1997
    Same author

    1997 Presidents' Forum.

    Food management·1997
    Same journal

    National health care reform, Part 2: Response to pharmacists.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Validity of originality assessment.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Unit dose dispensing of chromic phosphate P 32 suspension.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Hydralazine injection still available.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Improved extemporaneous formulation of cyclosporine ophthalmic drops.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Paclitaxel diluent and the case of the slippery spike.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Nutrition
    • Gastroenterology
    • Medical Devices

    Background:

    • Enteral nutrition (EN) is a critical therapeutic option for patients with malabsorption.
    • Parenteral nutrition (PN) is typically reserved for specific clinical situations.
    • Transitioning from PN to EN is often indicated for continued nutritional support.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the benefits, equipment, sources, indications, and administration techniques for enteral nutrients.
    • To compare the efficacy and safety of enteral versus parenteral nutrition.
    • To provide guidance on appropriate formula selection and patient monitoring during enteral feeding.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of benefits, equipment, sources, indications, and administration of enteral nutrients.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of clinical scenarios favoring enteral over parenteral nutrition.
  • Discussion of monitoring parameters and management of potential complications.

    • Main Results:

    • Enteral feeding is frequently preferable to parenteral nutrition in malabsorption states.
    • Specific enteral formulas are suitable for patients with intact gastrointestinal tracts.
    • Monitoring for hyperglycemia, dehydration, and organ status is essential; osmotic diarrhea can be managed by formula dilution or altered feeding rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Enteral nutrition offers significant benefits including effectiveness, low cost, and reduced complications.
    • Appropriate selection of enteral formulas and vigilant patient monitoring are key to successful outcomes.
    • Enteral feeding is a preferred method of nutritional support for many patients compared to parenteral therapy.