Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A useful algorithm for calculating central ray TAR and TMR values.

D E Wrede, H Dawalibi

    Medical Physics
    |May 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Shaped field electron dosimetry for a Philips SL75/10 linear accelerator.

    Medical physics·1983
    Same author

    FORTRAN algorithms for evaluating Fourier transforms of line spread functions.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·1983
    Same author

    Simple experimentally derived algorithm for computer calculated dose rates associated with 137Cs gynecologic insertions.

    Acta radiologica. Oncology·1980
    Same author

    Depth dose data for 4 MeV linear accelerators with lead or uranium field flatteners.

    Acta radiologica. Oncology·1980
    Same author

    An analysis of the dosimetry for mantle field therapy using 4 MV X-rays and its routine application.

    Revista interamericana de radiologia·1979
    Same author

    Dosimetric considerations of symmetric and asymmetric 60Co teletherapy split fields.

    Medical physics·1977
    Same journal

    Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    See all related articles

    A new algorithm accurately calculates tissue-air ratio (TAR) for Cobalt-60 teletherapy and tissue-maximum ratio (TMR) for linear accelerators, achieving less than 0.5% error. This method enables rapid dose calculations using programmable calculators for radiation therapy.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Physics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Computational Dosimetry

    Background:

    • Accurate dose calculation is crucial for effective radiation therapy planning.
    • Traditional methods for calculating dose distributions can be time-consuming.
    • Need for efficient algorithms in clinical settings for treatment time and monitor unit calculations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate a novel algorithm for calculating TAR and TMR.
    • To assess the accuracy of the algorithm by comparing calculated and measured dose values.
    • To integrate the algorithm into programmable calculators for rapid clinical application.

    Main Methods:

    • Implementation of a two-dimensional polynomial power functions least squares fit algorithm.
    • Application to tissue-air ratio (TAR) calculations for Cobalt-60 teletherapy.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application to tissue-maximum ratio (TMR) calculations for an 8MV LS75/10 linear accelerator.

    • Main Results:

    • Achieved less than +/- 0.5% error between calculated and measured TAR values for Cobalt-60.
    • Achieved less than +/- 0.5% error between calculated and measured TMR values for the linear accelerator.
    • The algorithm functions as a subroutine for programmable calculators, enabling swift calculations.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed algorithm provides a highly accurate and efficient method for TAR and TMR calculations.
    • This computational approach significantly speeds up the determination of treatment time and monitor units.
    • The algorithm's integration into calculators offers a practical tool for radiation oncology professionals.