Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Accuracy of bone mineral data.

S N Rustgi, J A Siegel, M Braunstein

    AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
    |August 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On-the-Scene Hyaluronan and Syndecan-1 Serum Concentrations and Outcome after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation.

    Mediators of inflammation·2019
    Same author

    [Arthroscopic repair of chronic lateral ankle instability].

    Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie·2019
    Same author

    [Influence of massive blood transfusion and traumatic brain injury on TIMP‑1 and MMP‑9 serum levels in polytraumatized patients].

    Der Unfallchirurg·2019
    Same author

    Initial free cortisol dynamics following blunt multiple trauma and traumatic brain injury: A clinical study.

    The Journal of international medical research·2019
    Same author

    Building and environmental factors that influence bacterial and fungal loading on air conditioning cooling coils.

    Indoor air·2018
    Same author

    [Fractures of the base of the V metatarsal bone-current concepts revised].

    Der Unfallchirurg·2018
    Same journal

    The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    See all related articles

    The Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer may overestimate bone mineral content by 6.5%. This study compared its measurements to the absolute ashing method to assess instrumental accuracy in bone density analysis.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Orthopedics
    • Materials Science

    Background:

    • Concerns exist regarding the accuracy of the Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer.
    • Potential calibration errors in bone mineral analysis instruments necessitate validation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the instrumental accuracy of the Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer.
    • To compare bone mineral content (BMC) measurements with an absolute standard.

    Main Methods:

    • Bone samples were analyzed using the Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer.
    • Absolute bone mineral content was determined using the ashing method for comparison.
    • Bone ash content, bone mineral density, and compact bone density were directly measured.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer consistently overestimated bone mineral content by approximately 6.5%.
    • Direct measurements yielded an ash content of 62.9%, bone mineral density of 1.346 g/cm3, and compact bone density of 2.140 g/cm3.

    Conclusions:

    • The Norland-Cameron Bone Mineral Analyzer exhibits a systematic overestimation of bone mineral content.
    • Calibration adjustments may be necessary for accurate clinical interpretation of Norland-Cameron analyzer data.