Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical experience with high frequency jet ventilation.

G C Carlon, R C Kahn, W S Howland

    Critical Care Medicine
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Computational hyperspectral light-sheet microscopy.

    Optics express·2022
    Same author

    A roadmap for metapopulation research.

    Ecology letters·2021
    Same author

    Laboratory evaluation of secondary causes of bone loss in Veterans with spinal cord injury and disorders.

    Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2019
    Same author

    Achievement of Reactor-Relevant Performance in Negative Triangularity Shape in the DIII-D Tokamak.

    Physical review letters·2019
    Same author

    Study for online range monitoring with the interaction vertex imaging method.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2017
    Same author

    Technical Note: Experimental carbon ion range verification in inhomogeneous phantoms using prompt gammas.

    Medical physics·2015
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) effectively supports patients with respiratory failure when conventional methods fail. This advanced ventilation strategy maintained alveolar ventilation and improved outcomes in critically ill patients.

    Area of Science:

    • Medicine
    • Pulmonology
    • Critical Care Medicine

    Background:

    • Conventional mechanical ventilation may be limited by barotrauma in certain respiratory failure cases.
    • High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) offers an alternative approach for patients unresponsive to standard support.
    • Understanding the clinical utility and outcomes of HFJV is crucial for managing complex respiratory conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the clinical experience and efficacy of HFJV in patients with severe respiratory failure.
    • To assess the required driving pressures and ventilator settings for HFJV in this patient cohort.
    • To compare the effectiveness of HFJV with conventional mechanical support in terms of gas exchange and hemodynamic stability.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 17 patients with respiratory failure treated with HFJV.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • HFJV settings included rates of 100 breaths/min, an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2, and cannula sizes of 1.06–1.62 mm.
  • Driving pressures and PEEP levels were recorded, along with patient survival and gas exchange parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • HFJV successfully maintained alveolar ventilation in all 17 patients, including those who did not survive.
    • Driving pressures rarely exceeded 27 psig, even with high PEEP levels (up to 32 cm H2O).
    • Eight out of 17 patients survived; HFJV provided superior oxygenation and ventilation compared to prior conventional support, and allowed discontinuation of inotropic support in some cases.

    Conclusions:

    • HFJV is a viable and effective ventilation strategy for patients with severe respiratory failure who are refractory to conventional mechanical ventilation.
    • HFJV can achieve adequate gas exchange with acceptable driving pressures, even in challenging clinical scenarios.
    • The use of HFJV may lead to improved patient outcomes and reduced need for vasopressors in select critically ill patients.