Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-benefit analysis and medical ethics.

G H Mooney

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |December 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    National Health Service priority setting is debated, especially with budget cuts. Economics and cost-benefit analysis can inform decisions, but ethical considerations are crucial for healthcare leaders and medical professionals.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Clinical freedom, efficiency, and the Griffiths report.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same author

    How much should we be spending on health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people?

    The Medical journal of Australia·1998
    Same author

    Rationing and the objectives of health care.

    The Medical journal of Australia·1997
    Same author

    Scotland's health: the road to the ills?

    Scottish medical journal·1993
    Same author

    Medical ethics and resource allocation in the NHS.

    Community medicine·1986
    Same author

    The NHS: efficiency need not be a dirty word.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1984

    Area of Science:

    • Health economics
    • Medical ethics
    • Public health policy

    Background:

    • The National Health Service (NHS) faces significant debate regarding priority setting, intensified by government directives and potential budget reductions.
    • Economic principles, particularly cost-benefit analysis, are increasingly proposed as tools to guide resource allocation and decision-making within healthcare.
    • The integration of economic evaluations into healthcare policy necessitates a thorough understanding of their ethical implications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the role of economic assessment in determining healthcare priorities within the NHS.
    • To explore the relationship between economic principles, specifically cost-benefit analysis, and medical ethics.
    • To raise awareness among healthcare decision-makers and medical professionals about the ethical dimensions of economic evaluations.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of economic theories and their application to healthcare.
    • Review of government documents and policy statements on NHS priorities.
    • Ethical framework analysis concerning resource allocation in health services.

    Main Results:

    • Economic analysis offers methods for optimizing resource allocation and evaluating competing health objectives.
    • Decisions on healthcare priorities are intrinsically linked to ethical considerations.
    • A gap exists in the awareness and integration of medical ethics within economic appraisal frameworks.

    Conclusions:

    • Economic tools can aid in healthcare priority setting, but they are insufficient without ethical guidance.
    • Healthcare decision-makers must critically assess the ethical underpinnings of economic analyses.
    • Further dialogue is needed to bridge the gap between health economics and medical ethics in policy development.
    Keywords:
    National Health Service

    Related Experiment Videos