Related Experiment Videos
The use of a simple method to avoid cell shrinkage during SEM preparation
Journal of Microscopy
|February 1, 1981
Summary
To minimize cell shrinkage during scanning electron microscopy preparation, researchers found that adding tannic acid and uranyl acetate treatments after glutaraldehyde and OsO4 fixation significantly preserves cell size.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Microscopy Techniques
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Specimen preparation for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) often involves chemical fixation and dehydration processes.
- Critical point drying is a common method used to remove transitional fluid without causing surface tension damage.
- Standard fixation protocols can lead to significant cellular volume loss, impacting morphological accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate methods for reducing cellular shrinkage during specimen preparation for SEM.
- To evaluate the efficacy of additional chemical treatments in preserving cell volume.
Main Methods:
- Cells were fixed using glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide (OsO4).
- Specimens underwent critical point drying.
- Comparative analysis of cellular diameter was performed between standard fixation and a protocol including tannic acid and uranyl acetate treatments.
Main Results:
- Standard glutaraldehyde and OsO4 fixation followed by critical point drying resulted in a mean cellular diameter reduction of approximately 45%.
- Successive treatment with glutaraldehyde, OsO4, tannic acid, and uranyl acetate significantly reduced shrinkage to about 5%.
Conclusions:
- The addition of tannic acid and uranyl acetate to the fixation protocol is highly effective in preventing cellular shrinkage.
- This enhanced protocol improves the morphological fidelity of cells prepared for scanning electron microscopy.