Related Experiment Videos

Costs and benefits associated with treatment for coronary artery disease

Circulation
|November 1, 1982
PubMed

Insights

Comparing treatment costs for coronary artery disease, surgical interventions were more expensive than medical therapy. Myocardial infarctions significantly predicted higher costs, impacting patient return to work and perceived health status.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Cooperative Unstable Angina Study (UAS) provide data on medical and surgical treatments for coronary artery disease.
  • Understanding treatment costs is crucial for healthcare decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present direct and indirect costs of medical versus surgical treatments for patients in the CASS and UAS.
  • To identify predictors of cost and analyze patient outcomes like return to work and perceived health.

Main Methods:

  • Cost analysis of inpatient treatments for stable and unstable angina.
  • Stepwise multiple regression and discriminant-function analysis to identify cost predictors and patient subgroups.

Main Results:

  • In UAS, 1-year costs were $6867 (medical), $10,574 (surgical), and $23,045 (late surgery).
  • Number of myocardial infarctions was the strongest cost predictor. Discriminant analysis identified 85% of medical patients needing late surgery.
  • Surgical patients had lower return-to-work rates than medical patients in UAS. CASS patients had 1-year costs of $3432 (medical), $11,100 (surgical), and $13,554 (late surgery).

Conclusions:

  • Surgical treatment for coronary artery disease generally incurs higher costs than medical therapy.
  • Patient outcomes, including return to work and perceived health, vary between treatment groups, with surgical patients reporting better health perception.
  • Myocardial infarction history is a key factor influencing treatment costs.

Related Concept Videos