Related Experiment Videos
Brain parenchyma penetration by intrathecal ionic and nonionic contrast media
AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology
|September 1, 1982
Summary
Intrathecal metrizamide and methylglucamine iothalamate show similar brain penetration and concentration in dogs. This suggests differences in neurotoxicity are not due to varying contrast medium levels in the brain.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Intrathecal metrizamide, a nonionic contrast medium, penetrates the normal brain.
- Complications from intrathecal metrizamide may correlate with cerebral concentration.
- Metrizamide is considered less neurotoxic than ionic contrast media at equivalent iodine concentrations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the brain penetration of intrathecal metrizamide and methylglucamine iothalamate.
- To investigate if reduced cerebral concentration explains the lower neurotoxicity of metrizamide.
- To assess blood-brain barrier integrity following intrathecal contrast administration.
Main Methods:
- Adult greyhound dogs received intrathecal injections of metrizamide and methylglucamine iothalamate at a similar iodine concentration (280 mg I/ml).
- Brain penetration depth and cortical gray matter concentration were evaluated 1 hour post-injection using computed tomographic scanning.
- The integrity of the blood-brain barrier was assessed qualitatively using Evans blue.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in brain penetration depth or concentration was observed between metrizamide and methylglucamine iothalamate.
- The rate of diffusion across the cerebrospinal fluid-brain interface appears similar for both contrast media.
- No gross disruption of the blood-brain barrier was evident with either contrast agent.
Conclusions:
- The comparable brain penetration of metrizamide and methylglucamine iothalamate does not support the hypothesis that metrizamide's lower neurotoxicity is due to reduced cerebral concentration.
- The observed differences in neurotoxicity are likely attributable to factors other than contrast medium concentration at the brain interface.
- Both nonionic and ionic contrast media, at the tested concentrations, did not appear to compromise the blood-brain barrier integrity significantly.