Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relative efficiency in survival analysis.

A R Willan

    Journal of Chronic Diseases
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Analyzing patient survival times is more efficient than using survival proportions when median survival ratios are three or less. Survival proportion analysis offers efficiency in specific scenarios with larger group differences.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.

    BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2020
    Same author

    Planned Cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2019
    Same author

    Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2018
    Same author

    Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2015
    Same author

    Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at Neonatal Follow-Up programmes.

    Child: care, health and development·2013
    Same author

    Haemophilia prophylaxis: how can we justify the costs?

    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2012
    Same journal

    LEPROMATOUS LEPROSY AND AUSTRALIA ANTIGEN WITH COMMENTS ON THE GENETICS OF LEPROSY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN AN ADULT DIABETIC POPULATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    ESSENTIAL TRACE METALS IN MAN: MOLYBDENUM.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    DISTINGUISHING PHYSIOLOGIC VARIATION FROM ANALYTIC VARIATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    AORTITIS SYNDROME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS CLINICAL PICTURE AND ETIOLOGY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Survival Analysis
    • Clinical Trial Design

    Background:

    • Comparing survival experiences between two groups is fundamental in clinical research.
    • Traditional methods often rely on analyzing times to death or proportions surviving.
    • The efficiency of these methods can vary based on study parameters and observed differences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the relative efficiency of two distinct survival analysis methods: analyzing times to death versus analyzing the proportion surviving a fixed period.
    • To compare these methods under different constraints, including fixed patient entry, fixed duration, and cost considerations.
    • To determine optimal analytical strategies for comparing survival data in clinical trials.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of statistical efficiency for two survival analysis approaches.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation across scenarios with fixed patient entry, fixed trial duration, and fixed cost.
  • Mathematical and simulation-based assessments of method performance under varying survival ratios.

    • Main Results:

    • Analyzing individual times to death is statistically more efficient when the ratio of median survival between groups is three or less.
    • Analyzing the proportion surviving a fixed period demonstrates greater efficiency in specific situations, particularly when substantial differences in survival exist between groups.
    • Efficiency is also considered in relation to trial duration and overall study cost.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between analyzing survival times or proportions depends on the expected magnitude of difference in survival and study design constraints.
    • For smaller to moderate survival differences (median survival ratio ≤ 3), focusing on individual survival times is recommended for greater statistical power.
    • Survival proportion analysis may be advantageous for detecting larger survival differences, especially within fixed timeframes or cost budgets.