Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Paradox lost. The latah problem revisited.

M G Kenny

    The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study challenges the biomedical explanation for latah, a culture-bound syndrome. It argues that latah-like phenomena are best understood through local cultural meanings, not a universal startle reflex.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Disease process or social phenomenon? Reflections on the future of multiple personality.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·1998
    Same author

    Multiple personality and spirit possession.

    Psychiatry·1981
    Same author

    Latah: the symbolism of a putative mental disorder.

    Culture, medicine and psychiatry·1978
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cultural Psychiatry
    • Medical Anthropology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Latah is a culture-bound syndrome from Malay culture, characterized by sudden fright, compulsive obscenity, and mimesis.
    • A paradox arises as similar conditions are reported in unrelated cultures.
    • Dr. R. C. Simons proposed latah is a culture-specific exploitation of the universal human startle reflex.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the validity of Simons' resolution of the latah paradox.
    • To argue against a universal neurophysiological basis for latah and similar phenomena.
    • To propose an alternative framework for understanding latah-like conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of Simons' proposed neurophysiological explanation.
    • Examination of ethnographic data from Siberia as a case study.
    • Comparative analysis of latah-like phenomena across different cultural contexts.

    Main Results:

    • Evidence does not support Simons' theory that latah is based on a universal startle reflex.
    • Latah-like conditions are deeply embedded in local cultural values and meanings.
    • Siberian ethnographic material illustrates the importance of local context.

    Conclusions:

    • The "latah paradox" is an illusory construct stemming from a biomedical oversimplification.
    • Understanding latah and similar phenomena requires a focus on local cultural context and meaning.
    • Biomedical approaches risk misinterpreting these conditions and distorting clinical practice.

    Related Experiment Videos