Related Experiment Videos
Bromocriptine and lisuride in Parkinson disease
Annals of Neurology
|January 1, 1983
Summary
Lisuride and bromocriptine offer benefits for advanced Parkinson disease patients with diminished levodopa response. Both drugs improved motor function, though tolerability and long-term efficacy varied, suggesting cost may influence future use.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Parkinson disease (PD) management often involves levodopa.
- Advanced PD can lead to diminished levodopa response, including "wearing off" and "on-off" phenomena.
- Alternative or adjunctive therapies are crucial for managing these complex motor fluctuations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and tolerability of lisuride and bromocriptine as adjuncts to levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson disease.
- To evaluate the impact of these dopaminergic agonists on motor function and "off" time.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 25 patients with Parkinson disease and diminished levodopa response.
- Patients received either bromocriptine or lisuride as an add-on therapy to levodopa.
- Outcomes assessed included changes in disability, "on" time, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Both bromocriptine and lisuride significantly reduced disability and increased "on" time in patients with advanced Parkinson disease.
- Bromocriptine was discontinued in 11 patients due to adverse effects and in 14 due to decreased efficacy.
- Lisuride was discontinued in 8 patients due to adverse effects.
- Despite similar efficacy in improving motor symptoms, patient populations differed in age, disease duration, and baseline disability at drug initiation.
Conclusions:
- Both bromocriptine and lisuride are effective in managing advanced Parkinson disease patients experiencing diminished levodopa response.
- Adverse effects and decreased efficacy were noted for both agents, impacting long-term use.
- The choice between bromocriptine and lisuride may ultimately depend on individual patient tolerance, specific adverse event profiles, and cost-effectiveness.