Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization II. A comparison between plain silicone elastomer, and...

Central venous catheters of two types were inserted through basilic or cephalic veins punctured at the fossa cubiti in 61 patients: 39 soft silicone elastomer (S.E.) and 22 stiffer polyethylene (P.E.) catheters were compared regarding their thrombogenicity. Mean duration of catheterization was 6.5 days. Radiological thrombi in the peripheral and central veins visualized by phlebography were significantly smaller, and the incidence of the mural thrombi in the central veins significantly lower with the S.E. than with the P.E.-catheters, but the use of S.E.-catheters did not reduce the incidence of clinical thrombophlebitis in arm veins: 14 cases in the group with S.E. and four in that with P.E.-catheters. In both groups, the maximum incidence of clinical thrombophlebitis occurred 4-8 days after catheterization. Later, there seems to be a low risk for the appearance of clinical thrombophlebitis with both catheters. Neither the surface topography of the catheter materials, nor the platelet adhesion on their surfaces in contact with human blood in vitro offered conclusive arguments for interpretation of their thrombogenicity in vivo. Catheter stiffness seems to play an important role in inducing mural thrombus formation in central venous cannulation in man.