Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.

A R Møller

    Ear and Hearing
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Digital filters, clinically used for 3 years, are compared to analog filters for their effects on brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) waveforms and noise suppression capabilities.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Acute high-intensity sound exposure alters responses of place cells in hippocampus.

    Hearing research·2009
    Same author

    Tinnitus and pain.

    Progress in brain research·2007
    Same author

    Is there a place for microvascular decompression?

    Acta neurochirurgica·2005
    Same author

    Neurophysiologic basis for cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.

    American journal of audiology·2002
    Same author

    Symptoms and signs caused by neural plasticity.

    Neurological research·2001
    Same author

    Similarities between severe tinnitus and chronic pain.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Signal Processing

    Background:

    • Brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory pathway function.
    • Noise in electrophysiological recordings can obscure important waveform features.
    • Traditional analog filters have limitations in noise reduction and waveform preservation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of digital filters versus analog filters in clinical BAEP analysis.
    • To evaluate the impact of digital filters on BAEP waveform morphology.
    • To assess the noise suppression capabilities of digital filters in BAEP recordings.

    Main Methods:

    • Clinical data from BAEP recordings using both digital and analog filters were analyzed.
    • Waveform characteristics were quantitatively compared between filter types.
    • Signal-to-noise ratio was assessed for both filter implementations.

    Main Results:

    • Digital filters demonstrated comparable or superior noise suppression to analog filters.
    • Digital filters preserved key BAEP waveform components effectively.
    • Subtle waveform differences were observed, warranting further investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital filters offer a viable and effective alternative to analog filters for clinical BAEP analysis.
    • The use of digital filters in BAEP recordings can enhance signal clarity and diagnostic accuracy.
    • Further research should explore optimal digital filter parameters for various clinical applications.

    Related Experiment Videos