Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Delayed feedback audiometry: reliability of repeated measures.

W A Cooper, D Citron

    Ear and Hearing
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Squamous cell carcinoma differentiation at progression as a resistance mechanism in metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma harbouring a targetable mutation.

    Pathology·2022
    Same author

    Identification of an Optimized Heating and Fast Ion Generation Scheme for the Wendelstein 7-X Stellarator.

    Physical review letters·2020
    Same author

    Excitation Mechanism of Low-n Edge Harmonic Oscillations in Edge Localized Mode-Free, High Performance, Tokamak Plasmas.

    Physical review letters·2019
    Same author

    Treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the landscape and approach to emerging patterns of treatment resistance in the Australian context.

    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology·2017
    Same author

    The role of canonical and non-canonical Hedgehog signaling in tumor progression in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer.

    Oncogene·2017
    Same author

    Mutant p53 upregulates alpha-1 antitrypsin expression and promotes invasion in lung cancer.

    Oncogene·2017
    Same journal

    Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    See all related articles

    Delayed auditory feedback testing for hearing thresholds is reliable, though it may slightly overestimate hearing loss compared to voluntary responses. Test precision remained consistent over time.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Hearing Science

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of hearing thresholds is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
    • Traditional methods rely on voluntary patient responses.
    • Novel methods like delayed auditory feedback (DAF) offer potential alternatives.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds measured using DAF versus voluntary responses.
    • To assess the impact of repeated testing over time on threshold precision for both methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Ten adults with normal hearing sensitivity participated.
    • Hearing thresholds at 1000 Hz were measured using DAF and voluntary responses.
    • Each procedure was tested three times daily for five consecutive days.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • DAF yielded hearing threshold estimates that were, on average, 4.6 dB greater than voluntary responses (p < 0.05).
    • No significant change in the precision of test results was observed over the five-day testing period for either method.

    Conclusions:

    • DAF is a reliable method for assessing hearing thresholds at 1000 Hz.
    • DAF may systematically overestimate hearing thresholds compared to voluntary responses.
    • Hearing threshold measurement precision is maintained over repeated sessions with DAF.