Children's comprehension of semantic constraints on temporal prepositions

Children's comprehension of the semantic rules for temporal prepositions was investigated. The temporal prepositions were in, on, and at. Leech's (1969) semantic analysis was used as the framework for the study. The contextual property [(x)] leads to TIM[PERI] with its related constraints indicates the ill-formedness of phrases like in noon, on January and at Saturday. Correct usage of these prepositions is based on the implicit distinction between time with or without duration (period versus moment). Comprehension differences among the prepositions, based on semantic differences were hypothesized, as well as developmental differences across age levels. Thirty-five children at each of three levels (kindergarten, grades 2, and 4) in Experiment 1, and 24 grade 4 children in Experiment 2, judged the appropriateness of sentences containing temporal prepositions and attempted to revise the ill-formed sentences. Significant developmental differences were observed. Kindergarten children could not discriminate between well- and ill-formed sentences; second grade children could discriminate but could not identify the reason for their discrimination, nor could they revise the ill-formed sentences. Fourth grade children could discriminate and identify or revise the ill-formedness. Ability to revise the prepositions was found to be related to cognitive developmental level. None of the children in either experiment were able to articulate the periodicity-moment temporal distinction which provides the basis for the semantic constraints. The awareness of semantic rules for temporal prepositions may be relatively late in developing, perhaps between the ages of 8 and 10 years. An advanced awareness of these rules may develop considerably later.