Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using sentences to convey spatial information.

P W Foos

    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Learning spatial relationships is easier with sentences than pairs because language structures help. This study reveals how linguistic cues in sentences facilitate spatial learning compared to simple pairs.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of presentation order on the construction of linear orders.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Adult age differences in semantic and episodic memory.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1998
    Same author

    Working memory resource allocation by young, middle-aged, and old adults.

    Experimental aging research·1995
    Same author

    Adult age differences in the storage of information in working memory.

    Experimental aging research·1992
    Same author

    Age differences in memory for two common objects.

    Journal of gerontology·1989
    Same author

    Adult age differences in working memory.

    Psychology and aging·1989
    Same journal

    Cognitive Individual Differences in Multilingualism: Language Aptitude and Working Memory in L3 Learners.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    Same journal

    Grasp Motor Representations Facilitate Conceptual Preparation in Speech Production.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    Same journal

    The Lexical Tone Partially Depends on Segments: Evidence from Visual-World Eye Tracking.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    Same journal

    Unearthing Perfectionism and L2 Speaking Performance among Iranian EFL Learners: The Moderating Role of Cultural Collectivism.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    Same journal

    Child Bilingual Acquisition of Spanish Dative (Non-)clitic Doubling Structures: A Case Study Approach to Home and Community Input Conditions.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    Same journal

    Using Eye Tracking to Examine Effects of Overt Localization on Referential Processing in German Sign Language Sentence Processing.

    Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Linguistics
    • Spatial Cognition

    Background:

    • Learning spatial relationships is crucial for cognitive development.
    • Presentation order significantly impacts learning success.
    • Previous research indicates differences in learning from sentences versus pairs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate why learning spatial relationships differs between sentence and pair formats.
    • To identify the role of linguistic structures in spatial learning.
    • To analyze the impact of stated relationships on learning processes.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants learned spatial orders (e.g., ABCD) from pairwise (e.g., B-C) and sentence (e.g., 'B is left of C') inputs.
    • Various presentation orders were employed for both input types.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The study compared learning success and processing efficiency across conditions.
  • Main Results:

    • Sentence-based learning of spatial relationships is more effective than pair-based learning.
    • The presence of explicit linguistic cues (e.g., 'left') in sentences facilitates learning.
    • Linguistic structures in sentences enhance fundamental cognitive processes involved in spatial learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Language plays a significant role in how individuals learn and represent spatial information.
    • The structure and explicit relational terms within sentences provide a cognitive advantage for spatial learning.
    • Understanding these linguistic influences can inform educational strategies for teaching spatial concepts.