Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hand-scoring of multiple choice questions.

J Anderson

    Medical Education
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Hand-scoring multiple-choice questions (MCQs) remains valuable for quick assessments, especially when computer access is limited or for small, non-critical exams. This method offers practical advantages for certain testing scenarios.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Meta-analysis for descriptive research.

    Research in nursing & health·1992
    Same author

    Oxygen-induced lung damage. Relationship to lung mitochondrial glutathione levels.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1992
    Same author

    Comparison of psychosocial adaptation and sexual function of survivors of advanced Hodgkin disease treated by MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD.

    Cancer·1992
    Same author

    Effects of verapamil on the acute toxicity of doxorubicin in vivo.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1992
    Same author

    Hypothesis for the control of clotting factor VIII inhibitory antibodies by decreasing potency of helper T-cell-recognized epitopes in factor VIII.

    Scandinavian journal of immunology·1992
    Same author

    Relationship of [3H]Ara-C incorporation and response to therapy with high-dose Ara-C in AML patients: a Leukemia Intergroup study.

    Experimental hematology·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Assessment
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Computer-based scoring of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is prevalent due to accuracy, speed, and ease of statistical analysis.
    • However, prerequisites like computer availability and data capture methods (e.g., optical mark reading) can be limiting factors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the continued relevance and practical applications of hand-scoring MCQ papers.
    • To identify specific conditions under which hand-scoring is a viable and efficient alternative to computer scoring.

    Main Methods:

    • Manual scoring techniques for one-from-five MCQs and multiple true/false questions were examined.
    • The feasibility of obtaining key statistical data (e.g., mean score, standard deviation, item discrimination) through hand-scoring was assessed.
    • Recommended marking systems, including the +1, -1, 0 method for multiple true/false, were considered.

    Main Results:

    • Hand-scoring is efficient for short papers (≤30 questions) or small candidate groups (≤10).
    • Simple statistical analyses like total scores, mean, and standard deviation are readily achievable with hand-scoring.
    • While more complex analyses (e.g., item discrimination) require extra effort, they are feasible for specific needs.

    Conclusions:

    • Hand-scoring remains a valuable tool for non-critical exams requiring rapid results.
    • It is particularly useful when computer resources are unavailable or for small-scale assessments.
    • Combining hand-scoring with feedback discussions enhances its pedagogical value.

    Related Experiment Videos