Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized clinical trials in neurosurgery.

S J Haines

    Neurosurgery
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Neurosurgical clinical trials often suffer from poor reporting and low statistical power, limiting their ability to answer key questions. Improving trial quality requires biostatistical collaboration and multi-institutional cooperation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Virtual Nursing in Residential Aged Care: What Is Known? A Rapid Review.

    Journal of advanced nursing·2025
    Same author

    Ventriculoperitoneal shunt migration presenting with vaginal discharge and hydrosalpinx in a 16-year-old patient.

    Pediatric emergency care·2002
    Same author

    Proof before practice. The practice of neurosurgery must change to thrive.

    Clinical neurosurgery·2001
    Same author

    Aseptic meningitis after intraventricular administration of gentamicin.

    Pharmacotherapy·2001
    Same author

    History of randomized clinical trials in neurosurgery.

    Neurosurgery clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Fate of rigid fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Neurosurgery
    • Clinical Trials
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for advancing neurosurgical care.
    • However, the quality of existing neurosurgical RCTs requires critical evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the quality of reporting, statistical design, and analysis in published neurosurgical RCTs.
    • To identify limitations hindering the ability of these trials to answer critical neurosurgical questions.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic analysis of 51 randomized trials in neurosurgery.
    • Evaluation criteria included study content, reporting completeness, and statistical methodology.

    Main Results:

    • Significant omissions in reporting critical study components were common.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical design and analysis quality varied widely, with generally low statistical power.
  • Few major neurosurgical questions were definitively answered by the analyzed trials.

    • Conclusions:

    • The quality of current neurosurgical clinical trials is often insufficient to provide definitive answers.
    • Enhancing neurosurgical trial quality necessitates early biostatistical consultation and collaborative multi-institutional studies to boost statistical power.