Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improvement of scintigrams by computer processing.

S M Pizer, A E Todd-Pokropek

    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    |April 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hierarchical shape description via the multiresolution symmetric axis transform.

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
    Same author

    Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay.

    Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2000
    Same author

    Registration of 3D cerebral vessels with 2D digital angiograms: clinical evaluation.

    Academic radiology·2000
    Same author

    Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape.

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2000
    Same author

    Medial-node models to identify and measure objects in real-time 3-D echocardiography.

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2000
    Same author

    Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

    Journal of digital imaging·1998
    Same journal

    Letter from the Editors.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Expanding Horizons: The Role of Kaleidoscope and Relevant Images in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The diagnostic performance and clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in pleural mesothelioma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Feasibility of treating neuroendocrine prostate cancer with anti-SSTR radioligands: A systematic review of imaging and treatment studies.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    <sup>18</sup>F-FDG -PET/CT in cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and future directions.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Maximizing diagnostic yield: A systematic review and deep dive into PSMA PET scan protocol variations for prostate cancer.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Computer processing significantly enhances scintigram quality by correcting image degradation and improving structure visualization. Observer studies confirm improved lesion detection with processed images on modern displays.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Digital Image Processing
    • Nuclear Medicine

    Background:

    • Scintigraphy quality is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
    • Computer processing offers potential improvements in scintigram analysis.
    • Limitations exist in traditional scintigram display and processing methods.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore methods for improving scintigram quality using computer processing.
    • To detail techniques for image degradation correction and structure enhancement.
    • To assess the impact of processing on observer performance and display optimization.

    Main Methods:

    • Discusses techniques for reversing image degradation (nonuniformity, noise, resolution loss).
    • Highlights methods for enhancing structures of interest (slope, curvature analysis).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasizes the importance of high-quality display devices and matched processing.

    • Main Results:

    • Computer processing can increase accuracy by reversing degradation and enhancing structures.
    • Non-stationary techniques may be more successful than stationary ones for noise/resolution correction.
    • Specific smoothing (binomial, variable shape averaging) and sharpening/smoothing (unsharp masking, Metz/Wiener filtering) techniques are recommended.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer processing, when combined with appropriate display technology, improves scintigram quality and lesion detectability.
    • Careful observer testing is essential to validate the clinical usefulness of processing techniques.
    • Optimizing display contrast and matching processing to display capabilities are key.