Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

09:36
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Humidity as a source of measurement error in osteometrics
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|April 1, 1983
Summary
Increased humidity causes bone expansion, affecting skull measurements in osteometrics. These changes are minor and reversible, but represent a potential source of error in scientific studies.
Area of Science:
- Osteology
- Biological Anthropology
- Forensic Science
Background:
- Dried, preserved bone specimens are susceptible to environmental changes.
- Humidity variations can potentially influence the physical dimensions of skeletal material.
- Accurate osteometric measurements are crucial for various scientific disciplines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of humidity on the dimensions of dried, preserved macaque skulls.
- To determine if humidity variation causes measurable bone expansion.
- To assess the impact of such changes on osteometric data.
Main Methods:
- Ten macaque skulls were subjected to a controlled high-humidity environment for 24 hours.
- Nine standard skull dimensions were measured before and immediately after humidification.
- Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant changes in dimensions.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant increase in skull dimensions was observed with increased humidity.
- The molar tooth row length increased by approximately 0.50% (0.1 mm).
- The greatest skull length increased by approximately 0.57% (0.9 mm).
- Specimens reverted to original dimensions within 1-2 days post-exposure.
Conclusions:
- Humidity variation demonstrably causes minor, reversible expansion in preserved bone.
- These bony changes represent a real, albeit small, source of measurement error in osteometrics.
- Findings support practical observations of dimensional variability in museum specimens across different environments.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
Air content measurement in concrete is critical for ensuring structural integrity and durability of concrete structures, especially in environments prone to severe weather conditions. Accurate air content analysis optimizes concrete's resistance to freeze-thaw cycles and enhances its workability and strength. Several methods are standardized under ASTM guidelines to measure the air content in fresh concrete, each suitable for different concrete types and conditions.
The pressure method,...
The pressure method,...

