Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculated nerve conduction velocity dependence upon the method of testing.

R L Joynt

    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A SPECIAL CRUTCH FOR MEN WHO HAVE LOST BOTH AN ARM AND A LEG.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    The concentric versus the monopolar needle electrode. The case for monopolar needles.

    Muscle & nerve·1998
    Same author

    The selection of electromyographic needle electrodes.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1994
    Same author

    Antidromic sensory nerve conduction studies of medial and lateral plantar nerves in normals.

    Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology·1993
    Same author

    The source of shoulder pain in hemiplegia.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1992
    Same author

    Electromyography interference pattern decomposition.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1991
    Same journal

    Sociodemographic Determinants of Food Insecurity and Its Association with BMI in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the All of Us Research Program.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    Same journal

    The effectiveness of perioperative respiratory muscle exercise in elderly cardiac surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    Same journal

    Correlates of Loneliness in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    Same journal

    Promoting Client-Centered Communication in Rehabilitation: Strategies for Managing Difficult Conversations.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-Domain Benefits of Exergaming for Sarcopenia Management in Institutionalized Older Adults: Physical, Psychological, and Social Outcomes.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    Same journal

    Health Literacy During Inpatient Rehabilitation and Its Association with One-Year Health and Functional Outcomes in Individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
    See all related articles

    Calculating nerve conduction velocities involves six methods, with latency measurement to the negative peak causing significant variability. Understanding these calculation artifacts is crucial for standardizing and comparing nerve conduction velocity values.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Electrophysiology

    Background:

    • Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) assessment is vital for diagnosing neuropathies.
    • Standardized NCV measurements are essential for reliable clinical interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of different latency measurement techniques on NCV calculations.
    • To identify the primary sources of variability in NCV results.

    Main Methods:

    • Six distinct methods for calculating NCV using evoked nerve potentials were analyzed.
    • Latency measurements were performed at the onset or peak of the negative potential.
    • Techniques included single/dual stimulation and single/dual recordings.

    Main Results:

    • NCV values are method-dependent, influenced by latency measurement and velocity calculation techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement of latency to the negative peak of the evoked potential is the major contributor to variability.
  • Variability exists across all tested NCV calculation methods.

    • Conclusions:

    • Calculation artifacts significantly impact NCV results.
    • Standardization of latency measurement and calculation methods is necessary for consistent NCV data.
    • Awareness of methodological influences is key for accurate NCV interpretation and comparison.