Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Penalties in multiple-choice and true-false questions.

J H Koeslag, C W Melzer, S R Schach

    South African Medical Journal = Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Geneeskunde
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Students with partial knowledge gain points on multiple-choice and true-false tests, unlike random guessing. Scoring adjustments impact rewards for unanswered questions, not the relationship between informed guessing and score ranges.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    MUTATIONS DO NOT ACCUMULATE IN ASEXUAL ISOLATES CAPABLE OF GROWTH AND EXTINCTION-MULLER'S RATCHET RE-EXAMINED.

    Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
    Same author

    Cellular injury in ischaemia.

    Cardiovascular journal of South Africa : official journal for Southern Africa Cardiac Society [and] South African Society of Cardiac Practitioners·2004
    Same author

    Integral rein control in physiology II: a general model.

    Journal of theoretical biology·2000
    Same author

    A computer simulation of free-range exercise in the laboratory.

    Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·1999
    Same author

    The chromogranins and the counter-regulatory hormones: do they make homeostatic sense?

    The Journal of physiology·1999
    Same author

    Integral rein control in physiology.

    Journal of theoretical biology·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Assessment
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Students may employ various strategies to indicate a lack of knowledge in tests, including random guessing or leaving questions unanswered.
    • Traditional scoring methods may not adequately differentiate between random guessing and partial knowledge.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze scoring strategies in multiple-choice and true-false tests.
    • To demonstrate how partial knowledge influences test scores.
    • To investigate the impact of scoring system modifications on rewards for unanswered questions.

    Main Methods:

    • Mathematical analysis of scoring in objective tests.
    • Comparison of scores resulting from different guessing strategies (random, informed, no-knowledge).
    • Evaluation of the relationship between scores under varying penalty conditions.

    Main Results:

    • Partial knowledge leads to higher scores than random guessing due to an increased probability of correct answers.
    • A consistent mathematical relationship exists between informed guessing scores and extreme scores (minimum, maximum, random).
    • The penalty for incorrect answers primarily affects the score attributed to unanswered questions.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective test scoring can reward partial knowledge, distinguishing it from random guessing.
    • The relationship between informed guessing and score boundaries is robust across different scoring systems.
    • Adjusting penalties in test scoring influences the value of unanswered questions without altering the fundamental scoring dynamics for informed guesses.

    Related Experiment Videos