Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequential stopping rules and sequentially adjusted P values: does one require the other?

W D Dupont

    Controlled Clinical Trials
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Increased blood pressure visit-to-visit variability in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: association with inflammation and comorbidity burden.

    Lupus·2019
    Same author

    Analysis of factor VIII gene inversion mutations in 166 unrelated haemophilia A families: frequency and utility in genetic counselling.

    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2016
    Same author

    Aging mice have increased chromosome instability that is exacerbated by elevated Mdm2 expression.

    Oncogene·2011
    Same author

    Immunohistochemical analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction activity in chordoma.

    Neuropathology and applied neurobiology·2007
    Same author

    Estimating the undetected burden of influenza hospitalizations in children.

    Epidemiology and infection·2006
    Same author

    Historical and epidemiologic background of human premalignant breast disease.

    Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia·2004
    Same journal

    On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    See all related articles

    Sequentially adjusted P values are inappropriate for clinical trials as they depend on hypothetical outcomes. Fixed P values, alongside medical plausibility and pre-specified results, better indicate trial certainty.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trial Methodology
    • Medical Research

    Background:

    • Clinical trials often require periodic data reviews to decide on early termination.
    • Sequential analysis adjusts P values to account for potential early stopping.
    • This adjustment aims to maintain statistical significance despite interim analyses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To argue against the use of sequentially adjusted P values in clinical trials.
    • To propose alternative methods for assessing the strength of evidence from clinical trials.
    • To highlight factors that contribute to the credibility of clinical trial conclusions.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual argument and critical analysis of statistical methods.
    • Discussion of the philosophical basis for statistical evidence.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of sequentially adjusted P values with fixed P values.

    • Main Results:

    • Sequentially adjusted P values are deemed inappropriate because they are influenced by decisions based on hypothetical outcomes.
    • The strength of evidence should rely on observed results, not on actions that might have been taken in alternative scenarios.
    • Fixed P values are considered more appropriate when combined with other credibility factors.

    Conclusions:

    • The credibility of a clinical trial relies on the observed data's implausibility under the null hypothesis, medical plausibility, and pre-specified outcomes.
    • Publishing fixed P values alongside these factors provides a more accurate measure of certainty.
    • This approach avoids the subjectivity introduced by sequential adjustments based on potential future decisions.