Presynaptic inhibition, EPSP amplitude, and motor-unit type in triceps surae motoneurons in the cat

1. Composite group Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) produced by heteronymous nerve stimulation were recorded from triceps surae motoneurons of barbiturate-anesthetized cats. Motoneuron rheobase, input resistance, and axonal conduction velocity were measured, and motor units were classified on the basis of the mechanical responses of their muscle units. 2. The amplitude of EPSPs recorded from 33 medial gastrocnemius (MG) motoneurons ranged from 0.6 to 4.3 mV. The mean EPSP amplitude differed among the major MG motor-unit types, increasing in the order fast twitch, fast fatiguing (FF); fast twitch, fatigue resistant (FR); slow twitch, fatigue resistant (S) (FF less than FR less than S). The amplitude of EPSPs recorded from 15 soleus motoneurons ranged from 0.3 to 3.4 mV, with a mean of 1.4 mV. 3. Presynaptic inhibition of EPSPs was produced by trains of conditioning volleys in the posterior biceps-semitendinosus (PBST) nerve. In 33 MG cells PBST conditioning stimulation reduced the amplitude of EPSPs by 11-50%, with a mean inhibition of 27%. The amplitude of EPSPs in 15 soleus motoneurons was decreased by 5-84%, with a mean inhibition of 37%. 4. When the magnitude of presynaptic inhibition was expressed as percent inhibition, there was no relation between presynaptic inhibition and either motor-unit type or the amplitude of the EPSP. However, when presynaptic inhibition was expressed as the absolute amount of inhibition in millivolts, the magnitude of inhibition was highly correlated with EPSP amplitude both across the entire triceps surae population (MG, lateral gastrocnemius, soleus) as well as within each muscle population. This correlation was also significant within the MG FF and FR motor-unit populations. 5. We conclude that EPSP amplitude and not motor-unit type is the major determinant of the magnitude of presynaptic inhibition. However, because of the effect of motor-unit type on EPSP amplitude, the net effect is that presynaptic inhibition increases in the order FF less than FR less than S.