Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the concept of analyzability.

H M Bachrach

    The Psychoanalytic Quarterly
    |April 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Psychoanalytic inquiry often assumes analysts are comparable, but this paper argues individual differences in understanding and applying psychoanalytic procedures question clinical data comparability. These analyst variations are crucial for understanding analyzability factors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On the efficacy of psychoanalysis.

    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1991
    Same author

    "Analyzability": a systematic review of the clinical and quantitative literature.

    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1978
    Same author

    Empathy. We know what we mean, but what do we measure?

    Archives of general psychiatry·1976
    Same author

    Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherap: a review of quantitative research.

    Psychological bulletin·1971

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoanalysis
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychological Research Methods

    Background:

    • Current models of analyzability rely on the assumption that psychoanalysts are comparable instruments for observation and influence.
    • This assumption facilitates the collection and comparison of clinical data across different analysts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To question the assumption of analyst comparability in psychoanalytic inquiry.
    • To explore how individual differences among psychoanalysts impact the understanding and application of psychoanalytic procedures.
    • To examine the implications of these individual differences for the comparability of clinical observation and data.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of psychoanalytic theory and practice.
    • Critical examination of the model of inquiry underlying current understandings of analyzability.
    • Exploration of the concept of individuality within the psychoanalytic enterprise.

    Main Results:

    • The inherent individuality in psychoanalytic understanding and application challenges the notion of relative comparability among analysts.
    • Clinical observations and data derived from psychoanalytic practice may not be as directly comparable as previously assumed.
    • These individual variations are significant factors influencing analyzability.

    Conclusions:

    • A realistic understanding of analyzability must account for the unique contributions and variations among individual psychoanalysts.
    • The assumption of analyst comparability may oversimplify the complexities of psychoanalytic practice and data interpretation.
    • Further research is needed to develop frameworks that accommodate analyst individuality in assessing analyzability.

    Related Experiment Videos