Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

PHS perspectives on misconduct in science.

E N Brandt

    Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    |March 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Public Health Service is improving policies to address research misconduct, including data falsification and ethical breaches. This initiative emphasizes collective responsibility to uphold scientific integrity in federally funded research programs.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Human cell-conditioned media produced under embryonic-like conditions result in improved healing time after laser resurfacing.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2011
    Same author

    The prevention of shaken baby syndrome.

    The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·2001
    Same author

    Prevention and early detection of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents.

    The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·2001
    Same author

    The Human Genome Research Project: implications for the healthcare industry.

    The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·2001
    Same author

    Some thoughts about women's health and its evolution.

    The journal of gender-specific medicine : JGSM : the official journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia·2001
    Same author

    Posttraumatic stress two years after the Oklahoma City bombing in youths geographically distant from the explosion.

    Psychiatry·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Research Integrity
    • Scientific Ethics

    Background:

    • Research misconduct poses a threat to scientific integrity.
    • Existing safeguards are insufficient to prevent and detect willful wrongdoing.
    • Incidents include data falsification and non-compliance with subject protection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop improved policies and procedures for addressing research misconduct within Public Health Service (PHS) programs.
    • To define research misconduct, encompassing violations of laws, regulations, policies, ethical breaches, and non-compliance with award terms.
    • To establish a collective responsibility framework for preventing and addressing misconduct.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and revision of existing policies and procedures for research misconduct.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a comprehensive definition of research misconduct.
  • Establishment of clear roles and responsibilities for research agencies, institutions, and investigators.
  • Collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as the lead agency for policy development.

    • Main Results:

    • A major effort by the PHS to enhance policies and procedures for research misconduct.
    • A broad definition of misconduct encompassing legal, ethical, and compliance violations.
    • Affirmation of collective responsibility among agencies, institutions, and investigators.
    • Development of policy statements and procedures by research institutions and professional organizations.

    Conclusions:

    • Traditional scientific safeguards are insufficient to prevent and detect misconduct.
    • A collective responsibility among research agencies, institutions, and investigators is crucial.
    • Prompt and equitable handling of misconduct allegations is essential.
    • The PHS, led by NIH, is implementing comprehensive policies and procedures to strengthen research integrity.