Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between five methods for the separation of IgM.

A Negro Ponzi, E Cerio, A Angeretti

    Microbiologica
    |April 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A compact-rigid multi-analyser for energy and angle filtering of high-resolution X-ray experiments. Part 2. Efficiency of a single-crystal-comb.

    Journal of synchrotron radiation·2023
    Same author

    Development of a quantitative-competitive PCR for quantification of human cytomegalovirus load and comparison with antigenaemia, viraemia and pp67 RNA detection by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification.

    Panminerva medica·2006
    Same author

    Molecular structure of a D-homoandrostanyl steroid derivative: single crystal and powder diffraction analyses.

    The journal of physical chemistry. B·2006
    Same author

    Development and utilization of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay to evaluate human polyomavirus JC DNA load.

    Panminerva medica·2006
    Same author

    Co-detection and discrimination of JCV and BKV DNA by duplex nested-PCR in renal transplant recipients.

    Panminerva medica·2004
    Same author

    Epstein Barr viral load monitoring by quantitative PCR in renal transplant patients.

    The new microbiologica·2003
    Same journal

    The epidemiology of Lyme borreliosis in Italy.

    Microbiologica·1992
    Same journal

    Serum cholesterol levels in axenic mice colonized with Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus.

    Microbiologica·1992
    Same journal

    Frequency of Mobiluncus spp. in bacterial vaginosis in Italy.

    Microbiologica·1992
    Same journal

    Transfection of E. coli with lambda DNA by electroporation.

    Microbiologica·1992
    Same journal

    Extracellular phenoloxidase activity of micromycetes from various taxonomic groups.

    Microbiologica·1992
    Same journal

    Effect of ethylenediamine di-o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid and transferrin on the growth of some bacterial strains in vitro.

    Microbiologica·1992
    See all related articles

    Comparing five serum fractionation methods for specific IgM antibody detection, Quaternary aminoethyl (QAE)-Sephadex chromatography offers the best IgM recovery (97%) and efficiency. Method selection depends on balancing IgM recovery, IgA contamination, dilution, cost, and speed.

    Area of Science:

    • Immunology
    • Biochemistry
    • Analytical Chemistry

    Background:

    • Accurate detection of specific IgM antibodies is crucial for diagnosing various infectious and autoimmune diseases.
    • Serum fractionation is a key step in isolating IgM for sensitive and specific antibody assays.
    • Evaluating different fractionation techniques is essential for optimizing IgM isolation and subsequent analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of five distinct serum fractionation methods for isolating IgM.
    • To assess each method's performance based on IgM recovery, purity (IgG and IgA contamination), cost, and execution time.
    • To determine the most suitable method for specific IgM antibody detection based on varying experimental priorities.

    Main Methods:

    • Protein A-Sepharose CL-4B chromatography

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Staphylococcus aureus absorption
  • Quaternary aminoethyl (QAE)-Sephadex chromatography
  • Ultrafiltration
  • Gel chromatography

    • Main Results:

    • Protein A-Sepharose and S. aureus absorption yielded 58% and 40% IgM recovery, respectively, with significant IgA contamination.
    • QAE-Sephadex chromatography provided excellent IgM recovery (97%) with minimal IgG and moderate IgA contamination, at low cost and time.
    • Ultrafiltration offered lower IgM recovery (31%) but allowed volume adjustment, with minimal IgG and IgA contamination.
    • Gel chromatography achieved complete IgG and IgA removal but resulted in significant IgM dilution and required substantial time.
    • No single method proved universally superior; choice depends on prioritizing IgM recovery, purity, cost, and speed.

    Conclusions:

    • QAE-Sephadex chromatography emerges as a highly efficient method for IgM isolation, balancing recovery, purity, and cost.
    • Protein A-Sepharose and S. aureus absorption are less efficient and result in higher IgA contamination.
    • Ultrafiltration and gel chromatography present specific advantages and disadvantages regarding recovery, purity, and sample handling.
    • The optimal serum fractionation method for specific IgM antibody detection is contingent upon the specific requirements of the assay and laboratory resources.