Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When to operate and what to operate upon.

D K Selby

    The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Improving spinal surgery outcomes requires precise patient selection and accurate structural diagnosis before any operation. Surgeons must utilize appropriate techniques tailored to specific diagnoses for better results.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Surgically proven internal disc disruption.

    Spine·1995
    Same author

    Fibrillar collagen-biphasic calcium phosphate composite as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusion.

    Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·1992
    Same author

    The role of anterior lumbar fusion for internal disc disruption.

    Spine·1988
    Same author

    Segmental instability. Rationale for treatment.

    Spine·1985
    Same author

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine with CT correlation.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·1985
    Same author

    Conservative care of the lumbar spine in the elderly.

    Geriatrics·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Neurosurgery
    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Spinal Surgery

    Background:

    • Spinal surgery results are often suboptimal, with literature citing 25-35% failure rates.
    • Current challenges include inadequate patient selection and diagnostic methodologies.
    • Historical diagnostic approaches for spinal conditions are becoming antiquated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify key factors contributing to suboptimal spinal surgery outcomes.
    • To emphasize the critical role of accurate structural diagnosis in surgical success.
    • To advocate for tailored surgical techniques based on specific diagnoses.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of common causes for poor spinal surgery outcomes.
    • Analysis of diagnostic and surgical decision-making processes.
    • Critique of outdated diagnostic methods like 'shaking the spinous process'.

    Main Results:

    • Suboptimal results stem from poor patient selection, inaccurate structural diagnosis, and inappropriate surgical techniques.
    • Psychological factors are overemphasized as a cause for failure, masking underlying structural issues.
    • Accurate, evidence-based structural diagnosis is paramount before any surgical intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhancing spinal surgery success hinges on three core principles: meticulous patient selection, definitive structural diagnosis, and precise, individualized surgical intervention.
    • Adoption of these principles is essential for improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical failure rates.
    • Modern spinal surgery demands a comprehensive approach, moving beyond antiquated diagnostic and treatment paradigms.

    Related Experiment Videos