Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levator muscle reconstruction: does it make a difference?

A S Brown, M A Cohen, P Randall

    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Correction to: Elevated maternal C-reactive protein and autism in a national birth cohort.

    Molecular psychiatry·2025
    Same author

    Patient-centred outcomes.

    BJA education·2025
    Same author

    De novo adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma with long-term pre-diagnostic imaging.

    Neuro-Chirurgie·2023
    Same author

    Infectious and immunogenetic factors in bipolar disorder.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2017
    Same author

    Insights into the effects of metal nanostructuring and oxidation on the work function and charge transfer of metal/graphene hybrids.

    Nanoscale·2015
    Same author

    Development of on-line FTIR spectroscopy for siloxane detection in biogas to enhance carbon contactor management.

    Talanta·2015
    Same journal

    Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    "Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Intravelar veloplasty for cleft palate repair in infants did not increase surgical morbidity but slightly improved speech outcomes. This technique may be beneficial for achieving better speech results in children undergoing palatal reconstruction.

    Area of Science:

    • Pediatric Surgery
    • Speech Pathology
    • Craniofacial Anomalies

    Background:

    • Cleft palate is a congenital condition affecting speech development.
    • Palatal reconstruction aims to improve both anatomical function and speech.
    • The role of levator muscle reconstruction in palatal repair outcomes is debated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare speech outcomes in children undergoing palatal repair with and without intravelar veloplasty.
    • To assess the impact of intravelar veloplasty on speech, specifically nasal escape and hypernasality.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective study of 85 children (6-8 months old) who underwent palatal reconstruction.
    • Two surgical groups: palatal repair without levator reconstruction (n=40) and with intravelar veloplasty (n=45).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Speech assessment at 2 years post-surgery, defining abnormal speech as any nasal escape or hypernasality.

    • Main Results:

    • 70% (28/40) of children without levator reconstruction had abnormal speech.
    • 63% (24/45) of children with intravelar veloplasty had abnormal speech.
    • Intravelar veloplasty did not add significant operative morbidity.

    Conclusions:

    • Intravelar veloplasty likely improves speech results in palatal repair.
    • The technique is justified due to enhanced speech outcomes without increased surgical risk.
    • Further research may explore long-term speech development and quality of life.